<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google Kitchen Sink Results</title> <atom:link href="http://piloseo.com/google/google-kitchen-sink-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://piloseo.com/google/google-kitchen-sink-results/</link> <description>SEO Thoughts, Ramblings, and Rants</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mark Pilatowski</title><link>http://piloseo.com/google/google-kitchen-sink-results/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link> <dc:creator>Mark Pilatowski</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:54:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://piloseo.com/?p=200#comment-64</guid> <description>Yeah, I have seen the variations on the SERPs but this is really the first time I&#039;ve seen them try to shove every type of result at the bottom of the page. That coupled with the move of the sponsored results to the left has left this page looking way too cluttered and schizophrenic. At least IMO.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I have seen the variations on the SERPs but this is really the first time I&#8217;ve seen them try to shove every type of result at the bottom of the page. That coupled with the move of the sponsored results to the left has left this page looking way too cluttered and schizophrenic. At least IMO.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title><link>http://piloseo.com/google/google-kitchen-sink-results/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link> <dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 01:44:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://piloseo.com/?p=200#comment-63</guid> <description>Nice to see the blog working again.Anyways this is nothing new.  Google has been testing this stuff on various data centers for years.  Put related searches here, blog posts there, &quot;our&quot; shopping results here and the news results there, mix in the 10 text links and we have a stew of info according to Google.The UI is always in flux as maaaan!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see the blog working again.</p><p>Anyways this is nothing new.  Google has been testing this stuff on various data centers for years.  Put related searches here, blog posts there, &#8220;our&#8221; shopping results here and the news results there, mix in the 10 text links and we have a stew of info according to Google.</p><p>The UI is always in flux as maaaan!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Pilatowski</title><link>http://piloseo.com/google/google-kitchen-sink-results/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link> <dc:creator>Mark Pilatowski</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:56:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://piloseo.com/?p=200#comment-62</guid> <description>Yeah, the SERPs are beginning to look extremely messy. With universal search listings and the fact that they decided to squish the paid results as close to organic as possible the results are starting to resemble a blob of text. I wonder how long it will be before the paid listings are injected within the organic results? They are obviously continually trying to blur the line between organic and paid so I wouldn&#039;t put that past them.As far as following Meta No Index tags, don&#039;t you know that Google is better than the webmaster at deciding which pages should be indexed and which should be left out. ;-) They treat Robots directives as mere suggestions and will index whatever they want.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the SERPs are beginning to look extremely messy. With universal search listings and the fact that they decided to squish the paid results as close to organic as possible the results are starting to resemble a blob of text. I wonder how long it will be before the paid listings are injected within the organic results? They are obviously continually trying to blur the line between organic and paid so I wouldn&#8217;t put that past them.</p><p>As far as following Meta No Index tags, don&#8217;t you know that Google is better than the webmaster at deciding which pages should be indexed and which should be left out. <img
src='http://piloseo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> They treat Robots directives as mere suggestions and will index whatever they want.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: danny</title><link>http://piloseo.com/google/google-kitchen-sink-results/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link> <dc:creator>danny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://piloseo.com/?p=200#comment-61</guid> <description>Google needs to wash out their asses.  They can start by pushing their paid results back over to the right where they belong.  From there, they need to stop trying to be cute with their lousy universal serp crap...and once that&#039;s fixed, maybe they can start adhereing to my MetaNoIndex no follow tags so that I don&#039;t have to spend a month lobbying for extra work just to please this horrible search product.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google needs to wash out their asses.  They can start by pushing their paid results back over to the right where they belong.  From there, they need to stop trying to be cute with their lousy universal serp crap&#8230;and once that&#8217;s fixed, maybe they can start adhereing to my MetaNoIndex no follow tags so that I don&#8217;t have to spend a month lobbying for extra work just to please this horrible search product.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk

Served from: piloseo.com @ 2010-09-07 04:51:06 -->